Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ariyapala Perera

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 17:54, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ariyapala Perera[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is a just a professor at a university. Not notable under WP:PROF or WP:GNG. A series of general references provided which mention the subject in passing but do not establish notability Dan arndt (talk) 02:17, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:18, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:18, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:18, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:18, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:35, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:PROF and WP:GNG.117.223.180.70 (talk) 12:05, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Without significant press coverage, I don't think the society presidencies mentioned in the article are enough for notability, and I don't see anything else of significance in the article. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now as my searches found nothing better than some Scholar results. SwisterTwister talk 06:45, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.