Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ariston Anderson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:27, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ariston Anderson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I removed the {{db-bio}} tag because notability is asserted by "Her work has appeared in the Village Voice, the Huffington Post, USA Today, AOL, and Coolhunting."

However, I have been unable to find reliable sources about this individual. A Google News Archive search returns eight results, all of which are news articles written by the subject. Ariston Anderson appears to fail Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Notability (people). Cunard (talk) 01:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)}}[reply]

Delete does not meet WP:CREATIVE, or any other parts of WP:N. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SquidSK (talk • contribs) 01:51, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. A google search returns numerous hits about this person, but the only hits are generally articles written by Ariston Anderson. For notability to be established, we would need to find some independent articles written about Anderson by an unaffiliated publication. SnottyWong talk 02:01, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as speedy tagger. When the above-mentioned references were added, I pondered removing my own speedy tag, but in the end I decided that the notability assertion they provide was just too vague and mention nothing about her being a regular contributor to these media outlets. Also, even though Google News returns a lot of stuff related to Ariston Anderson, these are just works by Anderson, and not about Anderson. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 14:46, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sufficient notability not established by reliable sources.--Staberinde (talk) 12:11, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.