Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arindom Chatterjee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with no prejudice against speedy renomination. clpo13_(talk) 22:55, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arindom Chatterjee[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I first tried to improve the page, but then realized it is just a promotional article about this composer without significant links to verify the information. I don't find him notable as per WP:MUSICIAN. Most links are not even reliable or don't open.

these links don't open http://enter10buzz.com/celebrity/arindom-chatterjee/ http://www.washingtonbanglaradio.com/content/124594612-bojhena-shey-bojhena-2012-bengali-movie-music-release http://www.gomolo.com/arindom-chatterjee-movies-list-popular/358132

these links are not reliable or show his notability https://web.archive.org/web/20151001035643/http://scoregoalsindia.com/isl-atletico-de-kolkata-theme-song-and-video-launch/ https://web.archive.org/web/20151003051659/http://www.gomolo.com/685328/photo-11279051

This link is of a music streaming platform which makes no sense as a reference https://www.jiosaavn.com/artist/arindom-chatterjee-songs/C-0SVyD2SU0_ Trolli Onida (talk) 15:35, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:57, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:57, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Info - Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd.

Logs: 2015-10 ✗ deleted ← 2015-09 ✗ PROD ← 2015-09 ✗ PROD

--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:45, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.