Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arijanet Muric

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Made his professional debut today against De Graafschap (non-admin closure) JMHamo (talk) 18:23, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Arijanet Muric[edit]

Arijanet Muric (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL JMHamo (talk) 21:05, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 21:10, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 21:16, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 21:16, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 04:02, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 04:03, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 04:17, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Userify Slightly WP:TOOSOON and a poorly sourced BLP at the moment - we will see if he features on Sunday, since he could debut very shortly. SportingFlyer talk 06:09, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Can be restored if/when he is notable. GiantSnowman 10:35, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comments Dutch league has just started, if his makes he debut, keep under WP:NFOOTBALL, however till then he should be in draft space. Govvy (talk) 12:58, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a non-notable footballer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:20, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:NFOOTY. Meets the professional standard. WP:GNG as well, but the professional standard is even more convincing. gidonb (talk) 04:40, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reply Gidonb, You've been around long enough to understand these Notability guidelines, you're keep argument is floored. Govvy (talk) 12:43, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Govvy: WP:NFOOTY applies in 7 days. The GNG applies right now. Can't tell if it is my WP longevity but I do miss the point of this nomination! ;-) gidonb (talk) 13:26, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep player now passes WP:NFOOTY, having played a professional match after the launch of this AFD. OZOO (t) (c) 18:02, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.