Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arian Catholicism (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:50, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arian Catholicism[edit]

Advertising for small "Internet church," no assertion of notability or third-party sources. None of the issues from the prior nomination were fixed. Anything useful should simply be merged into Arianism. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:02, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, obviously. Tiny group with exactly zero coverage in independent reliable sources. In fact a borderline A7 speedy, no plausible claim of notability whatsoever. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:36, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This intrigues me, and the article survived AfD 18 months ago. I'm going to do some poking in here and see if this is salvageable. Please do not close prematurely--I'll report on my progress when I have some. Jclemens (talk) 16:45, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm just finding Wikipedia, the church's various websites, and blog postings under both "arian catholicism" and "arian catholic church"--I'm all for not excluding minority religious views, but I can't find a single reliable, independent source. Jclemens (talk) 17:15, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your efforts though. Good job. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. —Jclemens (talk) 16:54, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- having looked extensively at the organisation's multipel website, I can see no evidence of any membership except one (probably self-appointed) primate and one archpresbyter. They claim to be holding services in certain Anglican Cathedrals, but I do not see any church even as liberal as them willingly tolerating the use of their buildings by heretics. There is a lot of information about Arianism on their website, but apart from that there is no substance to it at all. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:31, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Peterkingiron Ron B. Thomson (talk) 21:41, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Merge with the longer article on Arianism. This is a very small sub-set of Arianism generally. It is worthy of notice, but not worthy of its own article.Wikigonish (talk) 00:34, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - hardly meets WP:N and reads a lot more like some WP:SOAP. Shot info (talk) 04:10, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Still delete I repeated all the searches I did in December 2006 (easy, since I left links in the last AFD). There are still no independent reliable sources found by Google Web, Google Scholar, Google News (& Archives), or Google Books, and they still aren't listed as a denomination in the World Christian Database. GRBerry 04:21, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.