Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aretha Henry

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No need to draw this out, WP:SNOW. Randykitty (talk) 15:17, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aretha Henry[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Aretha Henry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See also Enchanted (Aretha Henry album) and Beautiful (Aretha Henry album). Fails WP:MUSICBIO. The second album to chart was on an Amazon.com chart, while all other positions are on charts for a seemingly non-notable music pool. Edited by a SPA who created the album articles and likely has a COI, though most of those contributions have been removed, except possibly the references. Now turning to the sources:

  1. A directory listing with no information.
  2. Possible dead link.
  3. Dead link.
  4. Official website.
  5. Directory listing, includes some material from this article.
  6. No professional reviews at AllMusic.
  7. Not working, reports as busy.
  8. iTunes listing for a various-artists compilation by a non-notable record label.
  9. A chart from the music pool mentioned above.
  10. A chart from the music pool mentioned above.
  11. Dead link, labeled as an interview.
  12. Looks like a primary source.
  13. Same website as [12].
  14. A chart from the music pool mentioned above.
  15. A chart from the music pool mentioned above.
  16. A chart from the music pool mentioned above.
  17. Does not mention Henry, her album Superhuman, or whatever "Masterpiece" is.
  18. Having difficulty loading this one, but according to @Richard3120:, it is "a reproduction of a press notice advertising the album."
  19. A chart from the music pool mentioned above.
  20. Short press release on her record label, Oz Avenue Entertainment. Oz Avenue Entertainment is not notable.
  21. An interview on YouTube.
  22. A directory entry with no information about the artist.
  23. Short "reader-submitted" local announcement of her wedding.

According to a Google search, it may fail WP:GNG. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 12:32, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment on point 18 above - at the bottom of the source in question are the words "The post 'New Music: Aretha Henry Releases New Album Superhuman' appeared first on Business Press Release Service", with a link to the original press release. Richard3120 (talk) 13:03, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. TMGtalk 17:19, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. TMGtalk 17:19, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - As noted by LaundryPizza, see also the two album AfD's (not bundled together because they were nominated by different people). LaundryPizza has a fine analysis of the sources used in the singer's article; all are run of the mill song listings or self-generated promotional items, and the charts are of suspicious validity. Over at one of the album discussions, Richard3120 did a search and found this newspaper piece: [1], and I have been unable to find anything else. Good luck to the singer but she is in pure self-promotional mode right now. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:55, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Like mentioned above, lack of WP:RS and possible WP:COI. – Broccoli & Coffee (Oh hai) 21:49, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:17, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. I wish Ms Henry the best in her music career, but to date the article from her local newspaper (linked by Doomsdayer520 above) seems to be the only substantial independent source available. Richard3120 (talk) 16:28, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for failing WP:NMUSICBIO. Good promotional work, folks, but what can you do: These AfDonauts are something else. -The Gnome (talk) 16:40, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Just to Sum Up - There is a lot of "See also" in the world of Aretha Henry deletion discussions. We now have four AfDs nominated by four different people over five days. This shows you the power of community, if you ask me. Here is what we have so far:
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:48, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Aretha_Henry&oldid=1137575616"