Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arekti Jiboner Golpo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SmartSE (talk) 21:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arekti Jiboner Golpo[edit]

Arekti Jiboner Golpo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm nominating this for deletion due to it not passing WP:NFILM. I came across it via a speedy nomination, which was removed by the article's creator. It was marked as promotional and while it is to an extent, I don't see it as so overly promotional that it would be speedyable that way. In any case, I can't find anything to show that this film is ultimately notable enough to merit its own article at this point in time. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:35, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: as per nomination. When and if notability is established in the future, then I will be fine with it. --BiH (talk) 09:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Darkwind (talk) 05:49, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete no sources provided to meet WP:NFILM. LibStar (talk) 13:32, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There are not enough dependable references to warrant an article. It does not appear that they exist.Whitescorp34 (talk) 01:46, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.