Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Area51 (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 04:01, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Area51 (band)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No proof of notability, fails WP:Music, sources cant pass WP:RS Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 10:03, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 10:09, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per the nomination. GNews nothing - Googling reveals same copy and paste text over a few promotional sites, and self-referencing interviews. There is a review of album Daemonicus here but if we are to take this web site seriously, the album is listed as being "independent", not on a major label. Another album Ankh here gives a record company that does not own to being part of a major. A third album Goddess here gives the same non-major label. EP Limited Brazilian Tour Edition is a google no-show. Demo CD here is listed as self-produced. We are then left with the links and text. The links are all promotional or self-promotional. The one inline cite appears dead from my end but seems to be another self-referencing interview. The fanpoop style text then, is totally unsupported. Acabashi (talk) 13:23, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No indication of notability. There is no mention of a label on the page, if I'm correct. Also, the above argument is pretty convincing. Backtable _{Speak to me}^{concerning my deeds.} 02:18, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:56, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable third-party sources ╟─Treasury Tag►senator─╢ 12:39, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.