Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ardeh Dam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of power stations in Iran. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 12:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ardeh Dam[edit]

Ardeh Dam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Micro-scale dam which does not meet WP:GNG. Has been tagged for notability since April 2010; however, no improvements were made to establish its notability. No English search results, except different wikies based on this page. There may be more deep coverage in Farsi. Beagel (talk) 17:03, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - As a hydroelectric generation plant and dam, notability can be assumed; and sources are very likley to be found in Farsi. Systemic bias may be an issue. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:13, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not every hydroplant and dam is notable, particularly in the case of micro- and small hydro projects. You can't just asume a notability of every micro- and small scale project. If there are sources satisfying WP:GNG, the article should be kept. Otherwise, it should be deleted. During almost four years nobody has provided any reliable third party source providing a significant coverage addressing the topic directly and in detail. Just mentioning the name of the dam by sources is not enough for WP:GNG. As for Systemic bias, it may be an issue, of course, but unlikely. During the last four years, members of WP:DAMS, particularly user:NortyNort has expanded all similar stubs created by the same author. Remained only stubs where no sources available. Beagel (talk) 06:10, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Very small dam which does not meet WP:GNG. Given the growth trend for renewable energy plants, notability cannot be simply assumed, or else things would quickly get out of hand. Johnfos (talk) 03:35, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to List of power stations in Iran or just delete. I did a similar AfDthree years ago on a plethora of planned dams in Iran. Hard to find information on these and it is a very small hydroelectric plant. I have worked on many of these articles and expanded what I could. If we don't delete or redirect it will be four more years!... of stub status...--NortyNort (Holla) 14:10, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 17:53, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • The other merge target would be the town it is adjacent to. I'd support that. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:13, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.