Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ardamax
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 05:44, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ardamax[edit]
- Ardamax (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
After a bit of searching, I can't see any reliable sources to assert notability. I don't think this key logger passes the notability guidelines. Chzz ► 01:52, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:54, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There seems to be several Russian GNews hits, which I can't evaluate. As for English, there's this, which doesn't seem reliable, and this which is borderline. Combined with the adverty tone, my vote is Delete --Cybercobra (talk) 05:07, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I removed the false categories, but nothing I can find seems to be a WP:RS on this. Admrboltz (talk) 13:08, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.