Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arctic Ambient

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:33, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arctic Ambient[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-solved issues after months of addition UnhappyRadio (talk) 13:15, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just to make it clear, this genre was invented by a person, and the page was created to be used as a source to make it more credible. The term has been used scarcely to describe a single artist.UnhappyRadio (talk) 03:32, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:02, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:54, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as my searches found nothing good to suggest improvement. SwisterTwister talk 06:34, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 15:19, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Straightforward delete. I have listed the issues with this article on the talk page. The submitter had many months to improve the article, remove original research, add reliable sources. There has been no effort to do so. The notability of the genre and neutrality of the article are highly questionable as well. Google search does not provide anything more reliable than the current "sources". This article should be removed asap. MiklakRYM (talk) 12:35, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.