Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archimedes-lab.org

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. So Why 07:12, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Archimedes-lab.org[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per source searches, does not meet WP:GNG or WP:WEBCRIT. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:51, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:51, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable website. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:14, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. Not-notable? What are your arguments beside 'not-notable'? I simply cannot believe that this award winning website's page is being considered for deletion. I really don't see how it fails the criteria of WP:WEBCRIT! The claim that the website's content, which is mathematics and recreational mathematics, is not-notable in my opinion is biased. This educational website/project is free, it is a source for many students and scholars since 1995, it has been cited in many academic papers, such as Scientific American, Smithsonian, Neural Correlates, On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (OEIS), etc. It has received a long list of accolades from the world of education (see its references). I think this site has its place in WP in comparison to other similar sites.

To conclude, this website is used as an external link in many WP articles, so there must be some editors who believe that the website's content is valuable. I really think that the site as a whole is an exemplar for mathematical education for both children and grown-ups. -- Ruotailfoglio (talk) 04:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)— Ruotailfoglio (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. (This includes Gianni A. Sarcone, on the website's founder). Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:27, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Just for your information (regarding verifiable sources):

a) List of educational & academic books citing/mentioning archimedes-lab.org: https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&hl=en&q=archimedes-lab.org

b) List of papers (PDF format) citing/mentioning archimedes-lab.org: http://www.pdfsearchengine.org/results.html?cx=016703912148653225111%3Aosmuvcrimei&cof=FORID%3A10&ie=UTF-8&q=filetype%3Apdf+%22archimedes-lab.org%22&qfront=%22archimedes-lab.org

c) List of entries citing/mentioning archimedes-lab.org in the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences: https://oeis.org/search?q=archimedes-lab.org&language=english&go=Search

d) Award Archimedes Lab won in 2003: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/2003-scitech-web-awards-m/

e) Award Archimedes Lab won in 2011: http://illusionoftheyear.com/2011/05/mask-of-love/

f) Award Archimedes Lab won in 2014: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/illusion-chasers/the-best-illusions-of-2014/
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruotailfoglio (talk • contribs) 13:07, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Ruotailfoglio (talk) 18:37, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:37, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947^{^{^{(c) (m)}}} 04:56, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for reasons given above. --Bduke (Discussion) 08:50, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for the reasons listed above. Ross-c (talk) 13:07, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.