Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arcel (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy-deletion (G11). (Non-admin closure) AllyD (talk) 06:32, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arcel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just another product. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:40, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The Previous AfD box seems inappropriate here: one to a band of the same name and the other to an entirely differently named firm with no relationship to this product? AllyD (talk) 17:10, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Aside from some routine announcements, Canadian Chemical News carried an article about the product in 2006 ([1] – via HighBeam (subscription required) ) but it is bylined to the company's technology leader and market manager, so is primary. As per the nomination, I am seeing nothing to indicate this product is individually notable. (There could be a case for merging the article into a section under Nova Chemicals?) AllyD (talk) 17:10, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed that the article text is pretty much a word-for-word copy of the company's own page on the product, so I've flagged CSD G12. AllyD (talk) 17:14, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.