Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arcadia University, Pennsylvania
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep per policy based rational. (non-admin closure) Valoem talk contrib 21:14, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Arcadia University, Pennsylvania[edit]
- Arcadia University, Pennsylvania (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a college campus, and any substantial information about the campus belongs on the main page for Arcadia University KKohn00 (talk) 14:48, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Merge/redirect to Arcadia University. Not notable in its own right. Boleyn (talk) 20:07, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:24, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete not notable by itself, but has reference to source into article Arcadia University Bryce Carmony (talk) 06:24, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:34, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:34, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep – Per WP:GEOLAND, qualifies for an article as a populated, legally-recognized place. Confirmed on American FactFinder (U.S. Census). North America1000 03:39, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GEOLAND. This is a standard article for a populated place; it's not the same thing (and does not contain the same information) as the university article. Removal would just create an unnecessary gap in our gazetteer coverage. -Arxiloxos (talk) 15:17, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep for completeness. Also passes my standards. Bearian (talk) 01:22, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.