Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arboretum Creek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Washington Park Arboretum. (non-admin closure) Ashley yoursmile! 04:10, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arboretum Creek[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Little to no notability. What could be found was articles only related to maintenance or public works on the creek itself... but all of that information would just serve better on the already existing page for Washington Park Arboretum. A merge is not appropriate because none of the information on the page is usual, as it's all original research performed by an editor 2 years ago without citations, and little of it is particularly reinforced by the few sources an acquaintance helped me find. Deku link (talk) 00:54, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Deku link (talk) 01:01, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:00, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure it should necessarily stand alone, but there's been a masters thesis specifically on the creek, and lots of mentions in the press. I think WP:GEOFEAT is probably satisfied, it just needs to be sourced. SportingFlyer T·C 12:16, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per below. SportingFlyer T·C 15:45, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

At this point I'm thinking merge to Washington Park Arboretum. The article on the latter is not that long. Mangoe (talk) 15:27, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per the above. No need for a standalone article, and what we have here would make a reasonable section there, where it's only mentioned twice with no detail or context. Jclemens (talk) 23:56, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Washington Park Arboretum there is no reason to have a sepeate article on this little stream when it is all in the arboretum and we have no sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:57, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.