Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arbor Daze

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 08:25, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arbor Daze[edit]

nn amateur film. User:Zoe|^(talk) 21:28, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment According to IMDB, looks to be a very, very, very low-budget horror film that went straight to video. The same cast and crew have done two others since, "Love & Plutonium" and "Weenie Roast Massacre" (not yet released). Nobody you've ever heard of was involved in any of these projects, and none of these people have ever been involved in anything you've heard of. Fan1967 00:16, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn no-budget film. Eivind ^t ^@^c 09:55, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
W.marsh 06:06, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The film seems notable enough, though the article is written in a rather unencyclopedic tone. I've added an IMDB link as well as a {{tone}} tag. dbtfz ^talk 07:13, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I suppose if it does have an IMDb link, then it is notable. Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 12:01, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Fan. MaNeMeBasat 14:13, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I didn't vote. I consider this one right on the borderline. It is an actual film, though the odds of your ever seeing it are pretty slim. Fan1967 16:09, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep, though I personally think it would be better served by a single article on Loose Change Entertainment, and have mentions for each of their films, release dates, primary contributors, external links, etc. It would serve to establish collective notability, when a straight-to-video release, that most people have never heard of nor will never see, in an article by itself doesn't really do that. It should be noted that the IMDB entries for their movies and actors were written by one of their actor/directors and shouldn't really be considered a truly independent source. -Dawson 20:14, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable. Newyorktimescrossword 20:30, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.