Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arabella Suttie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lack of coverage to establish notability at this time. If her career progresses to notability in the future, any admin can restore the old text as a draft, or a new article could be created from scratch. RL0919 (talk) 22:41, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arabella Suttie[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability, only independent source, Vavel.com, is an unreliable source where basically anyone can write articles (in this case, a student), and is not sufficient to establish notability anyway. I could find some passing mentions, but nothing substantial from an independent, reliable source. Fram (talk) 09:01, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, and England. Fram (talk) 09:01, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As I understand WP:SPORTCRIT, she would have to pass WP:GNG, which she does not. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:12, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets GNG, has appeared in a fully professional league game. Hjk1106 (talk) 18:00, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Appearing in a league (full pro or not) has no bearing on notability. Such "rules" were removed a while ago. Fram (talk) 18:09, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  Agree with Fram. WP:NFOOTY was retired which allowed footballers with at least 2 games played to have a page. But not anymore. Samanthany (talk) 01:06, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  Also, the Women's Championship was never listed as an WP:FPL anyway, so this statement was never correct. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:58, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  The four-minute sub appearance was in the "fully professional" WSL. So she would likely have got a free pass under the old rules. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 12:23, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No news coverage on here. Might have qualified under prior NFOOTY, but that was retired.Samanthany (talk) 01:05, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:04, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 14:00, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Possibly WP:TOOSOON for Arabella, but if she keeps playing at a high level after her knee injury then more sustained coverage like [1], [2] will inevitably follow and we can bring the article back. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 12:23, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lacks good secondary sources. The BBC piece is very minor. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 02:32, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.