Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ArUco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 00:19, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArUco[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After an in depth look through WP:NSOFT and its notability criteria, as well as searching for notable sources via Google, I am led to believe that this software does not meet the notability requirements for inclusion. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 11:36, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I added this article because it was referenced on the wikipedia page 'List_of_augmented_reality_software'. As you can see there are only 9 items in the 'Open Source' section, ArUco being one of them which I would consider to be notable software in the field of Augmented Reality. ArUco is also referenced on the 'ARToolKit' page as an alternative library. Sietl (talk) 12:19, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If it is notable, as you claim, then where are the sources for it? I trawled through 5 search pages of ArUco search finds, checking each one, and none of them are what I would consider notable sources as suggested by WP:NSOFT. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 12:30, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 13:34, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This AR library fails WP:N and WP:V. The failure of WP:V is not to say that it does not exist but fails to show anything beyond "it exists". I can't find anything encyclopedic about this article. Pmedema (talk) 19:02, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.