Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aquarius (notable persons)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pisces (notable persons). —Quarl (talk) 2007-01-01 04:16Z
Aquarius (notable persons)[edit]
- Aquarius (notable persons) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
This is a simple list of links intended to include one-twelfth of all Wiki-biographies — i.e., entirely free from information, ludicrously broad in scope, and based on an utterly meaningless random criterion. ➥the Epopt 07:34, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - arbitary indiscriminate listcruft. MER-C 08:15, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom - the article is just a collection of links
:Alternative - transfer to a Category, for example Category:Aquarius Notable Persons. Anthonycfc (talk • email • tools) 14:20, Wednesday December 27 2006 (UTC) - Delete, speculative. Punkmorten 21:30, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The content has no Neutral point of view. Tonytypoon 00:48, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, period/full-stop. NO category please, because that would be equally pointless. --Calton | Talk 02:29, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. CRGreathouse (t | c) 10:23, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete completely arbitrary scope, no added value.-- danntm T C 16:17, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.