Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aqua omnium florum

Aqua omnium florum[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn (non-admin closure). TonyBallioni (talk) 15:04, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating for deletion per WP:NOT. This entry is largely drawn from a public domain dictionary, and reads like a dictionary definition. Google returns mainly links that link here or provide a definition that is nearly identical, suggesting that it would be difficult to expand this to be an encyclopedic entry. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:38, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The nominated version was not actually taken from other works. That draft seems to have been mostly guesswork which was quite mistaken in supposing it to be a garden fertiliser — one might almost call it "bullshit" :). I have rewritten the page. Andrew (talk) 10:56, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn Thank you for the rewrite. I couldn't find any sources on it, but the version you just rewrote looks great. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:04, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.