Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apurv Gupta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

April 2015[edit]

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. PunjabWiki99 (talk) 20:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Apurv Gupta[edit]

The wikipedia page Apurv Gupta is constantly a source of vandalism and character attack. The first instances of vandalism were noted on 29 March 2014; 18:02 and administrators had requested protection or deletion. The current page created is in direct violation of Wikipedia policy as it constitutes an "Attack Page." Created for the sole reason to defame a living individual and substantiated by irregular evidential articles that do not seem to be consistent with the facts presented in the body of work, this page is being referred for speedy deletion. As a sincere gesture and humble apology to Apurv Gupta, the page has been blanked until it is deleted permanently. PunjabWiki99 (talk) 01:37, 28 April 2015 (IST)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

According to WP:AB , Constant vandalism on the page, therefore requesting protection or deletion for the time being. Bonzostar (talk) 18:02, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:BIO by a wide margin. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:15, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:05, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:05, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:BIO BerkeleyLaw1979 15:16, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.