Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/April Rain,band

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:21, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April Rain,band[edit]

April Rain,band (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced article about a band, whose only stated notability claim is that they and their music exist. As always, existence is not an automatic inclusion guarantee on Wikipedia in and of itself — to actually get in here, a band needs to be reliably sourceable as having attained one more more quantifiable achievements that pass WP:NMUSIC, but the only footnotes present here at all are their own self-published social networking content (Last.fm, vk.com) and a Q&A interview on a non-notable WordPress blog in which the band members are speaking about themselves in the first person. None of these are notability-supporting sources, but the article claims nothing about them that's "inherently" notable enough to earn the "keep and flag for reference improvement" treatment. Bearcat (talk) 14:01, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:01, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:01, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The current first footnote, an article in a publication called Fake Music Magazine, appears to be a reasonably reliable outlet for their country's music, but otherwise I can find little else in any language beyond self-produced social media and routine industry listings. It's either too soon for this band or the article is an inappropriate attempt at promotion. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:46, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.