Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/April Nelson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss Louisiana. (non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:54, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April Nelson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nelson is really only notable for being Miss Louisiana in 2015. Her previous losses is state competitions do not come anywhere close to notability. Her work as an actress at a theatre in Lousiana does not, nor does her being a party princess for hire. John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:43, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:02, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:03, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:03, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:03, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Miss Louisiana as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there as the 2015 winner. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:04, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now. Discussion about notability guidelines has already started on the Talk page for the Beauty Pageant project. No harm will be done by closing this nomination as "keep" and letting the project-level discussion take its course. NewYorkActuary (talk) 05:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Miss Louisiana. BLP-1E, at best. No harm will be done by deletion since this material can be userfied in the event that notability guidelines change. Project-level discussions have no direct effect on notability rules. Carrite (talk) 16:32, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as not independently notable. SwisterTwister talk 15:24, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The discussion on pageant winners' notability is taking place here: RFC on creation of consensus standard, with participants variously advocating that (1) state level winners are not presumed notable, (2) state-level winners are not presumed non-notable; or (3) a special guideline is unnecessary, and that GNG should be used. There's an overlap between the these three positions. There aren't really voices for "state-level winners are always presumed notable" so I don't think the outcome of the discussion, if any, would have an impact on this AfD, which is trying to establish whether the subject meets GNG. Thus it may not make sense to suspend the AfD process for this nomination.

I'm voting Delete as a BLP for a non-notable person is potential invasion of privacy and may be subject to vandalism. K.e.coffman (talk) 15:33, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Miss Louisiana per Northamerica1000. -- Dane2007 ^talk 18:56, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.