Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appuraman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 15:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Appuraman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Several concerns: the majority of claims, such as films or other projects worked on are unsourced which causes concern under WP:BLP, especially WP:BLPSOURCES. The one source given leads to Facebook. Although apparently an official FB page of a film producer, this can not be verified beyond reasonable doubt and is not sufficient as source. Searches for further google sources did not result in meaningful finds which would establish notability. Therefore, likely also failing WP:GNG _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 18:29, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 18:33, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 18:33, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 18:33, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 16:46, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.