Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appointments Bi-Language
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 00:35, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Appointments Bi-Language[edit]
- Appointments Bi-Language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional article for a rather run-of-the-mill temp agency. Fails WP:CORP. The article has some sources, but the articles are either from unreliable sources, blog-like sites, don't include significant coverage of the company, or are articles that are primarily about the founders of the company rather than the company itself. —SW— communicate 18:28, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure what exactly it means, but the user that created the article claims the logo (on commons) as his 'own work'. jorgenev (talk) 18:47, 29 March 2011
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have some authoritative articles from the The Guardian, The Times, Sunday Times, The Telegraph, London Evening Standard which will be referenced shortly.
I was involved in the logo creation; how should I proceed with a more correct licensing attribute?
Mattador79 (talk) 14:56, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can't verify the refs that are not URLs, but the others are either: primary, from the subject itself, its founder, or partners (PR). Others are simply directory listings and mentions that they were nominated for but did not win awards. Others only mention them in passing. The company does not seem to meet WP:CORP.
As for logo creation, you should see WP:COI- if you have a conflict of interest you are heavily discouraged from editing articles relating to it. If you yourself created the logo on behalf of ABL you likely do not own the necessary rights to license the image as you did. OSborn arfcontribs. 16:14, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 02:20, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Routine announcements of contracts and petty trade awards do not make a business notable. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:48, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:CORP does not seem to be met. WP:NOTPROMOTION may also be relevant. Wickedjacob (talk) 07:18, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.