Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Applied information economics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Applied information economics[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG, major WP:COI issues aside (see User:Hubbardaie). – Ploni (talk) 18:38, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Ploni (talk) 18:38, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:GNG, significant coverage of this topic can only be found in primary sources, that are seemingly authored by the article creator. SailingInABathTub (talk) 09:02, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unsure how to respond to a message you apparently sent directly to me. Yes I am new to this process and it has been many years since I've done anything in Wikipedia at all. I will review the primers you mentioned. Thanks. Hubbardaie (talk) 15:16, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Survived previous AFD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 02:12, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm not sure how the previous discussion resulted in a keep because it's not the best quality (though we are talking about something that happened over a decade and a half ago). Also note that there is also a deletion discussion on the author's page, Douglas W. Hubbard. SWinxy (talk) 19:28, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.