Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Application of CFD in Thermal Power Plant

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Maybe renominate if still deemed problematic after the cleanup by Biscuittin. Sandstein 10:03, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Application of CFD in Thermal Power Plant[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is completely unreferenced and no links to credible sources in the references. I'm unable to find verification regarding it's the notability or significance of claim. ♔ MONARCH Talk to me 07:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:32, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:32, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - would make a great engineering thesis paper but is probably too specific and technical for WP. WP:NOTJOURNAL shoy (reactions) 20:38, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:12, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the only specific link I found for this was at Books but nothing else better aside from that. WP:TNT and restart if and when better. SwisterTwister talk 06:21, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I have tidied up the article and I think it is now acceptable. Biscuittin (talk) 19:02, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:43, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter¹²³ (interview) 09:51, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.