Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appjet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, consensus is that it is notable. Davewild (talk) 11:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Appjet

Appjet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

non-notable website Choosing123 (talk) 12:57, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Arguing for notability: AppJet has been written up by major tech blogs (the external links section of the article was obscured by a mark-up error). They are a funded company and have a user community. Compare to other web sites that have achieved similar status like Anywhere.FM, Weebly, Parakey, and YouOS. -- DavidLG (talk) 05:20, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

There may be some confusion because AppJet refers to a company, a web site, and a software developer tool. I don't know about the company or web site, but I would argue for notability for the developer tool because it is a complete web application framework. It seems that all the frameworks listed on Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks have pages, some of which are more obscure than AppJet. -- Aaroniba (talk) 06:07, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - It is notable, it has been featured on major tech blogs (see external links) and the article has good sources. Urdna (talk) 16:57, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 06:36, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.