Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apostolos Gerasoulis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 15:16, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apostolos Gerasoulis[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:SOAP no sources, no evidence of notability. Acous mana 15:04, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Acous mana 15:04, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:39, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:39, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep he does have a GS profile with a total of 4200 citatations and an h-index of 27, which is not a whole lot in his field of computer science, but quite decent. However, a decent number of publications + creation of an algorithm that is widely used and powers a well known (relatively well known) product, taken together that is notable. --hroest 16:47, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep: in addition to the points hroest mentioned he also won an award from ACM (Test of Time) which might help him meet one of the criteria of WP:NPROF. Additionally, I found this article about his wedding on the New York Times: link to article KNivedat (talk) 16:22, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edited the page a bit and added 7 citations that I could find. KNivedat (talk) 15:24, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:54, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Passes WP:GNG as per sources below.

https://www.forbes.com/2007/10/02/internet-paid-search-tech-cx_ag_1003google.html
https://www.nytimes.com/1994/07/24/style/weddings-apostolos-gerasoulis-xiaolan-zhang.html
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2002-apr-01-fi-techsearch1-story.html
http://www.e-marketing-news.co.uk/Feb05/apostolos.html
https://www.seroundtable.com/archives/003764.html
https://sciences.academickeys.com/whoswho.php?dothis=display&folk[IDX]=105904
https://www.ilab.cs.rutgers.edu/~gerasoul/ Frigidpolarbear (talk) 15:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.