Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apollonia Vitelli-Corleone

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Corleone family. There is consensus that the article is not notable as standalone. I have chosen redirect over delete since the history remains intact, and someone may merge the content if they want to.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:18, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apollonia Vitelli-Corleone[edit]

Apollonia Vitelli-Corleone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete by redirect (WP:ATD-R) to Corleone family. Non-notable fictional character who died soon after appearing, served as a plot device. Topic already covered about as well at Wikia. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 19:07, 13 November 2013 (UTC) Green Cardamom (talk) 19:07, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I'm not really convinced that this fictional character would have used a hyphenated maiden name-married name combination. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:32, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, but are you supporting the deletion of the article? — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 08:34, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buffbills7701 00:22, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.