Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apollo Marketing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If anybody thinks there's anything here worth merging let me know. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:17, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apollo Marketing[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tone is ad-like, not notable. Perhaps merge with Aegis Group? Jasper Deng (talk) 01:23, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Merge with Aegis Group, the article is basically an advertisement and I couldn't find any reliable source to reinforce its notability. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 01:32, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at Aegis media, all the different subsidiaries have their own article - hence I thought that Apollo should of had one as well. Tried to remove some of the ad-like language and reduce the links so it would be more relevant... fail or success? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qitaz (talk • contribs) 02:18, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Tone is still no good. See WP:Notability and WP:MOS.Jasper Deng (talk) 03:32, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.

Delete per nomination. Yet another online advertising business. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:16, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.