Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aplocheilichthys sp. nov. 'Baringo'

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:31, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aplocheilichthys sp. nov. 'Baringo'[edit]

Aplocheilichthys sp. nov. 'Baringo' (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aplocheilichthys sp. nov. ——🦝 The Interaccoonale Will be the raccoon race (talkcontribs) 16:01, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. ——🦝 The Interaccoonale Will be the raccoon race (talkcontribs) 16:01, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per linked AfD - these species are essentially taxonomic phantoms that can never be nailed down now that they are extinct. No basis for an article. (Maybe don't make the nomination that terse though, at first I thought there wasn't a rationale at all) --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:11, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: not formally described? Then definitely not notable. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 19:50, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organisms and Kenya. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:38, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Not officially extinct, and real enough to warrant listing in the Red List. Once it is formally described, the article can be moved to the new name. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 11:47, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above. Only formally described species are considered automatically notable, and this fails GNG and SIGCOV besides. SilverTiger12 (talk) 04:32, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.