Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aparup Chakraborty

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 11:33, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aparup Chakraborty[edit]

Aparup Chakraborty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(In Bengali - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one Telegraph article covers him, but not in depth. Other Telegraph article only carries his quote. Local language coverage is lacking as well with passing mentions and a promo-toned two paragraph article from ABP Webdesk. Bengali WP doesn't have mentions of him as well. Hemanthah (talk) 11:18, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comments This read felt strangely WP:PROMOTIONAL, like it's put here to be the guys CV! Govvy (talk) 12:21, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Agreed, it seems like a puff-piece. Wondering if the coaching for their Special Olympics equivalent team is notable...Oaktree b (talk) 14:52, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    It appears to be the strongest of the references, but it just says that he was appointed as coach and is former captain of indoor team. Hemanthah (talk) 17:57, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - puff piece, no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 18:34, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per nom and other comments. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:42, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:NOTPROMO and failing WP:GNG. He doesn't meet a sport specific guideline (football or cricket) either. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. From a cricketing perspective there's nothing that makes him notable. StickyWicket (talk) 12:25, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:30, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.