Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apademik (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Apademik[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Releases are not on "important" label, The Orchard is a ditribution network not a tradional record label. Part of a walled garden built by his record company. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:48, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 04:20, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 04:20, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 04:20, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 04:20, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete in any case as this has existed since February 2007 with not much better change and it's unlikely this can be better improved. Pinging tagger Dthomsen8. SwisterTwister talk 04:38, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't see how all those sources, many of which are dead liks, listings, or otherwise not reliable sources. add up to notability. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:27, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Searches did not turn up enough to show they pass WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.