Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anwar Ahmed Zai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Notability not established. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 18:30, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anwar Ahmed Zai[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person, self-publicising, without reliable sources. Perhaps an Urdu speaker could find some. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:06, 18 December 2013 (UTC) Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:06, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete : Another self promotion. Bladesmulti (talk) 09:53, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:46, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:46, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:46, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Zai holds the senior position in the Board of Education (intermediate) in Karachi which is Pakistan's largest city. His Urdu name is انوار احمد زئی , via Google Translate: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Article has some cut and paste CV information from a who's who website, but that is easily deleted. -- GreenC 20:54, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:49, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sources prove existence buy not notability, Xxanthippe (talk) 22:24, 29 December 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 03:44, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.