Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anuraag Pandey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 05:02, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anuraag Pandey[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A radio jockey (Mumbaikars might know him as Picture Pandey) and cameo artist in some films fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Can't find much in RS to establish GNG. The sources currently used radioandmusic.com is part of Indiantelevision.com, which is a promotional site and notability of it has been questioned many times on wiki and consensus has been that it is non-RS. (Personally I would use these sites only for referring trivial things, like personal information through interviews published there; but not to establish notability.) Side note: The article is suspected of being created from COI editors/PR agency/cooperative editing - COI Noticeboard entry. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:15, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:16, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:04, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:04, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as aside from a few links here and there, there's simply nothing to suggest better. SwisterTwister talk 07:03, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:10, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as searches turned up no in-depth coverage from reliable sources to show it meets either WP:GNG or WP:ENTERTAINER. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.