Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anupam Mukhopadhyay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Giving appropriate weight to likely sock/meat puppets, consensus is to delete StarM 04:31, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anupam Mukhopadhyay[edit]

Non-notable poet. Claims to have only 1 award. Article promotes his next book to be published next year E Wing (talk) 03:09, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete - Non-Notable poet. No reliable sources have been provided ... most of the content seems to be self-promotional, and perhaps written by the subject or people associated with the subject. Fails WP:N. --Ragib (talk) 06:05, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

do not delete.-important young poet of West Bengal,India --user:Sudesna Majumdar5:08 , 12 November —Preceding undated comment was added at 13:10, 12 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Delete no reliable source to establish notability, also heavily promotional.--Boffob (talk) 14:44, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

do not delete .-- Anupam is an important poet of today's Bangla poetry .--user:nirjhar roy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.2.163.170 (talk) 14:02, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete-- Priyanka Pal Mukhopadhyay8:55 ,11 November 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Priyanka pal mukherjee (talk • contribs) 15:24, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This is a single purpose account which had also created a vanity page on herself. (speedied by now). --Ragib (talk) 17:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

how could you think about deleting Anupam's page !-- Anupam Mukhopadhyay is the most popular young poet in this decade . There is no important Bangla magazine which does not publish his poems . he is an Important critic . It seems he is going to give Bangla poetry a new shape .--user:prabhat chowdhury —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prabhat Choudhury (talk • contribs) 14:15, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Another single purpose account that has only added promo text to this article, or links to this article in 2 other articles.--Ragib (talk) 17:22, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

do not delete.-- anupam is the most gifted among the young bangla poets of today .--user:ibrahim_khan_ali —Preceding undated comment was added at 14:09, 11 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Strong Delete:Non-notable poet. It seems some editor is creating a number of accounts to oppose deletion. Can someone check for puppets and block them all? Thanks. --GDibyendu (talk) 18:09, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Concur with Dibyendu on block. --GPPande talk! 21:17, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: See Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets#User:Ibrahim_khan_ali --Redtigerxyz (talk) 14:59, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: no evidence of notability. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 15:00, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:28, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.