Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anuja Siraj

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 17:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Anuja Siraj

Anuja Siraj (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a writer with no strong claim to passing WP:AUTHOR. The article is sourced entirely to primary, commercial and social networking sources, with the sole indication of reliable source coverage in real media being a single blurb about her winning of a non-notable "teenager of the year" award -- and the "positive reviews" for her book are all on user-generated content sites like GoodReads or amazon.com, which means they're not the professional critical reviews that it takes to support notability. As always, Wikipedia is not a free public relations platform on which any writer is automatically eligible for an article just because she exists -- RS coverage, supporting a credible claim of notability, is required. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 20:57, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 21:03, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 21:03, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

• Delete as nothing currently suggesting better for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:18, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:54, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

• Delete: As above, non notable individual. Deathlibrarian (talk) 07:40, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.