Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antony Del Rio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 19:35, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Antony Del Rio[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I perviously tagged the article with a BLPPROD for only having an imdb external link. The article has now been deprodded but it was pointed out in its talk page that there wasn't any notability established in the article. And while there have been citations added onto the article, a majority of them do not seem to be reliable. So I do not believe that this article is notable enough to have a page on this site in its current condition. GamerPro64 00:39, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I even added a link for a video interview with Antony Del Rio where he personally discusses a majority of the biographical info listed on his wiki page. In addition, there are additional reliable citations, in addition to TVGUIDE themselves having his acting/voicing career documented. Therefore I find no need to delete this article as reliable references have been added and researched by myelf. Sorry I made this a great bio compared to what it was. You want citations, you got them. You might as well remove half the actors/actresses' pages on wikipedia as they primarily have imdb as primary citationss. Have a nice day! petsmartstar 01:39, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Maybe you're right and maybe I'm wrong about wanting this article get deleted. I personally just think it might not meet the standards. I'm not stopping you from improving the article. If there is enough material to warrant it on this site. GamerPro64 01:27, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ceradon (talk • contribs) 04:39, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ceradon (talk • contribs) 04:39, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ceradon (talk • contribs) 04:39, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ceradon (talk • contribs) 04:39, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Notability not established. Video games get a lot of google hits and this does not establish notability. We need to see sources discussing him biographically.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:17, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:02, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:19, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable secondary sources for the BLP material. There are a few user generated sources, which may be corrupt. The interview in the video game trade magazine is superficial and focuses on the game/role, not the person. So, fails WP:GNG for BLP. Gaff (talk) 05:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per Gaff (talk · contribs) arguments. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 21:08, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.