Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonio Capulín (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 01:49, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Antonio Capulín[edit]

Antonio Capulín (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable boxer - does not meet WP:NBOX. Last AfD contained too many additional nominations which resulted in No consensus. Peter Rehse (talk) 10:50, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 10:50, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:09, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:10, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Doesn't meet WP:NBOX and the only sources are links to his fight records and some routine sports reporting. There's also a big disconnect between the article's claim of his amateur record being 114-18 and the reference showing it at 3-3. Even if the article is correct, success as a junior does not imply notability. Papaursa (talk) 02:28, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as I simply see no better signs of better improvement at this time. Pinging RonSigPi. SwisterTwister talk 04:44, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails GNG and NBOX. Coverage is routine sports reporting. Conflict in amateur record, have to go with the source over the unsupported claim in the text. A junior medal doesn't show notability.Mdtemp (talk) 15:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.