Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonio Amores
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:43, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Antonio Amores[edit]
- Antonio Amores (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD removed by 77.225.45.232 (talk · contribs) with no explanation given. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL as the subject has not "appeared... in a fully professional league" and WP:GNG as the article shows no evidence of the subject receiving "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Mattythewhite (talk) 16:18, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NPSORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:27, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:27, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. czar · · 17:11, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. czar · · 17:11, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. czar · · 17:12, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails all relevant guidelines. Article is also almost certainly an autobiography, not that that's a reason for deletion, just worth noting..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:51, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 19:58, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.