Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonino Castrone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:21, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Antonino Castrone[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, severely lacking in sources and WP:NOTCV Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:35, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 17:43, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 17:43, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Appears to be a non-notable business person who was appointed to a purely administrative position at a university on the basis of having financial experience, but who has not really had any documented impact in academia outside of his own institution. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not the highest-level position at his university (he works under the rector and pro-rector [1]) and no other type of notability evident. The article is just a cv and says nothing other than his administrative position about what he might be notable for. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:32, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not pass WP:Prof or WP:GNG. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:51, 2 October 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Delete, purely an administrator, does not pass WP:PROF, too little evidence of passing WP:GNG/WP:BIO. Nsk92 (talk) 12:36, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the position, although it may seem significant at first, is still not convincing for independent notability and for WP:PROF. SwisterTwister talk 04:49, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete! The person is insignificant and lack of any interesting events, possibly a PR project — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zandradiliges (talk • contribs) 09:53, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Author I do not understand why passing the WP:Prof should be considered, as Antonino is not a professor nor an academic. Regardless of this, how long is this whole discussion thing going on? because I do not want to edit, if the article is going to be deleted - then I would much rather do a new reconsidered article. Furthermore I am new to writing articles on wikipedia and I find it hard to know how I should react to comments and this deletion discussion?A-K.C.P AUB (talk) 14:48, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I can understand very well how it is difficult for a new editor to know what to do about a deletion discussion such as this one, and please do not take this discussion personally or let it discourage you from contributing to Wikipedia. A good place to find out about these deletion discussions is at Wikipedia:Guide to deletion, and the reasons why such processes exist are explained at Wikipedia:Notability. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:43, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.