Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonia Sautter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 22:14, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Antonia Sautter[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP. Only working reference is her own website. The article is promotional. Rathfelder (talk) 12:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 12:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 12:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia needs to stop sourcing articles only to the subject's own website.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:56, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SIGCOV. Sources like her own website and Forbes (once a decent magazine, now full of paid puff pieces and outsourced content) do not add up to significant coverage." In 2008, this could have been excused, but not in 2021. Bearian (talk) 12:45, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:59, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.