Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antoinette Picatto

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 06:28, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Antoinette Picatto[edit]

Antoinette Picatto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as insufficiently notable actress. Yes, I know she was nominated for the Young Star Award for the Best Young Ensemble Cast in 2000 but that just ain't gonna cut it. Quis separabit? 23:47, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 00:15, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 00:15, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lonehexagon (talk) 02:57, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I left you a note on your talk page about ignoring the basics of notability when voting keep. This article has no sources. Someone is not notable just because they did something-- there have to be good published sources.104.163.147.121 (talk) 09:39, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Actually WP:NOTABILITY says they are notable if they pass the general notability guidelines OR one of the subject specific guidelines. She did 24 episodes on one show, but the others are just a one time guest appearance, and thus she doesn't meet the subject specific guidelines for actors that requires multiple notable roles, not just one. Dream Focus 13:36, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete a biography of a living person that lacks any reliable sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:04, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the only source I could find online was her name used once in long list of names in a NYTimes article. Fails GNG. No sources in article mean it should probably be speedy.104.163.147.121 (talk) 09:39, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.