Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antique Amor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 06:33, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Antique Amor[edit]

Antique Amor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

12.249.243.118 requested an AFD be started for this at WT:ANIME, after speedy deletion and prod nominations were both declined. The reason he gave for deletion is that it seems like an obvious hoax. At Talk:Antique Amor, he said "And the cast of this little fanfic includes a boy band member and Nickelodeon star, the lead singer of a visual kei band, and Miss Colombia 2011? Why this was not speedily deleted as an obvious WP:HOAX is beyond me". It also seems likely to me to be non-notable even if it isn't entirely a hoax. Calathan (talk) 17:41, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This is not a hoax but is not notable, the only things I could find were references in the form of blogs. Has there been any coverage of this in reliable news sources in Latin America? I would think there being big stars in the show that it would get that kind of attention. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:25, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete does not seem notable. Lucia Black (talk) 18:57, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.