Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antimaterialism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Closed as moot. Page has been entirely rewritten as a disambiguation page. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 23:13, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Antimaterialism[edit]

Sounds like something somebody made up one day in response to materialism. Unreferenced, possible neologism, not much more than a dictdef, POV, original research, and even manages to contradict itself by the final sentence. Closedmouth (talk) 09:36, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~Keep in its new form, thanks to User:Ihcoyc; original comment follows... (AlexTiefling (talk) 19:32, 7 November 2008 (UTC)) - a philosophical position which is opposed to genitals? I call WP:BOLLOCKS. There may be a good target for a redirect, though - there are existing anti-materialist philosophies, and there were gnostic sects which espoused views similar to what the article seems to be aiming at. AlexTiefling (talk) 10:47, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ in the absence of any sources for its existence as a significant matter for philosphical discussion.--Grahame (talk) 13:29, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as disambiguation page.--Grahame (talk) 02:20, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I replaced the text proposing a philosophical movement that denied the existence of genitalia with a disambiguation page. There might be more anti-materialist philosophies other than the ones I came up with off the top of my head that probably belong there also. I also redirected anti-materialism here while I was at it. If this works for people here, I would close this as moot shortly. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:01, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and close per Smerdis. Cosmic Latte (talk) 20:22, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.