Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Mosquito Innovation
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as totally unencyclopedic promotional material. Someguy1221 (talk) 03:00, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Anti-Mosquito Innovation[edit]
- Anti-Mosquito Innovation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable guy, totally un-encyclopedic article needs a dose of TNT. No refs, no links, prose. I checked for COPVVIO and CLOSEPARA but couldn't detect anything. Just so much wrong with the article, but Notability is biggest issue. (CSD has no criteria for "garbage article") L3X1 (distant write) 02:09, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.