Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony S Adams
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. 08:43, 8 September 2011 Athaenara (talk | contribs | block) deleted "Anthony S Adams" (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: more at User talk:A2adams - please read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:57, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Anthony S Adams[edit]
- Anthony S Adams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article was possibly created by the subject itself. There is very little citations that adhere to WP:RS and uses PR websites as sources.
- PR Websites are references directed to actaul issued press releases of relevent and notability.
Additional policy WP:NOTFACEBOOK applies as well. Phearson (talk) 02:55, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 03:30, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Please define reasoning for WP:NOTFACEBOOK. Currently not in agreement.
- Delete Google searches yielded scrappy references. No indication of notability. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 04:01, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Contesting Delete on the ground that the article defines notability and the references substanciate. Just another quick push to delete...
Advocating for removal from list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions discussion.
- PR references are not reliable sources, which do nothing but promote for the dollar. Phearson (talk) 13:48, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as SPAM Stuartyeates (talk) 09:45, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.