Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Migyanka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:22, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Migyanka[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Scarcely source biography (more {{cn}} than sources). And even if everything was true, it still does not meet notability in my eyes. bender235 (talk) 05:00, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:33, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:33, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - he is quoted a couple of times, but the only reference I can find about him as a person is a self-penned "about the author" in a book for which he wrote the forward. He is a managing partner in a firm with 10 employees (the businessweek reference.) Does not appear to meet any notability guidelines, including GNG. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:52, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 17:26, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no more than WP:TRIVIAL mentions, certainly not meeting WP:GNG. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:10, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.