Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Barendregt
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was merge to Christian Heritage Party candidates, 2004 Canadian federal election. --Sam Blanning(talk) 16:23, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Anthony Barendregt[edit]
NN former election candidate, never having received over 1% of the vote is hardly a claim to noteability. Seems to be vanity, certainly doesn't meet WP:BIO pm_shef 21:58, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Lbbzman 22:03, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Ardenn 22:13, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The nominator's accusations any given article on an unsuccessful political candidate in Canada is vanity violate assuming good faith. Here it impugns creator CJCurrie, a nonpartisan expert on Canadian political history and one of the best Wikipedia editors I have ever come across. Checking the history to see who has contributed to an article is about the least respect a nominator should have before putting it to everybody's attention on afd, and certainly before lobbing such a charge. Samaritan 23:11, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- While I realize that not everybody agrees on the notability of unelected political candidates, the precedent has already been set that federal candidates are entitled at least to inclusion in a merged list. Either keep or merge into a CHP candidates list; precedent already excludes outright deletion as an option. Bearcat 00:48, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless there's some other claim to notability. There isn't. Merge if you can find an article for his party. Fan1967 01:46, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note There is one, at Christian Heritage Party candidates, 2004 Canadian federal election. Fan1967 02:10, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.